Have a Microsoft 365 integration built without separate exports and manual work
Connect Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, Forms, or Power Automate to AFAS, Exact, a CRM, or another system. Not as a one-off trick, but as a managed process flow with permissions, logging, exception handling, and an owner.
Fixed price upfront based on systems, direction, authentication, data fields and exceptions.
Design → permissions → test data → run in parallel → production. The delivery time is set before work begins.
Least privilege, service accounts where appropriate, logging, and access handover. No hidden personal accounts as a critical link.
Common integrations
Process messages or attachments without manually saving and retyping them.
Validate form data, enrich it and send it to the source system.
Link documents, statuses, and actions to a business process instead of keeping them in separate folders.
Why integrations more often fail because of management than technology
Rights expire, field names change, exceptions are added and nobody knows who the owner is. That's why monitoring, error handling and readback belong in the build and not as optional aftercare.
Decision framework
Results are measured by less manual work, fewer errors, and demonstrably accurate transaction processing.
“We already have Power Automate.” Great — if that’s the best route, we’ll use it. The buying question is whether the process outcome is manageable, not whether it uses a specific tool.
Flows, documentation, permissions structure and administration information remain transferable to your own IT team or another supplier. See which other systems we integrate with at integrating systems.
Also relevant
Want to do more than connect systems and also handle recurring work more efficiently? See AI automation for SMEs.
Type over this order number. Once is doable. Forty times a day, every day, is a job.
The way it works now
- The appointment is in one colleague's mailbox
- Data is manually retyped from one system to another
- The person who knows is on vacation
- No one can see afterwards why this decision was made
As it is
- The agreement is stored with the client, findable for everyone
- Once entered, information flows through to the rest
- Work continues, even if someone is absent
- Every decision has a source, an owner, and a date
What is your next step?
Also good to know: frequently asked questions · security and data · terms and conditions · partners · research and figures · templates · what's changing · where you start
Where does the process break down in practice?
Emails, documents and customer agreements live in Microsoft 365 but not within the process that needs them. Which data can be shared securely and with proper controls?
Direct answer
Only integrate what demonstrably causes duplicate work, errors or delays. Start with one data stream, document ownership and error handling, then scale.
What we do
We connect analysis, business intelligence, data and execution so you don't get stuck in advice or loose tooling.
How it works
- We clarify the current situation, data and the real bottleneck.
- We determine the smallest working solution, owner and measurable outcome.
- We implement or prioritize the next step and verify the result.
- We secure what works and stop or fix what doesn't work.
What you get
A concrete analysis, priorities, decision criteria, an executable next step and visibility into what needs to be built, integrated or secured next.
For whom and whom not
Right for Dutch SMB organizations that want to solve a concrete process, knowledge, data or AI problem. Not for organizations looking only for a generic tool demo or unproven AI promise.
Costs and choice
Price and scope depend on the chosen next step. View the current fixed packages and pricing logic at pricing for digitization.
Risks and concerns
We work step by step, make assumptions and ownership explicit, use only the minimum necessary data, and maintain human control over decisions and execution.
Frequently asked questions before you decide
Does everything have to be done at once?
No. The preference is one clearly defined problem with a measurable outcome, then scale up.
What does it cost?
The current pricing and package logic is on the pricing page; custom work is only chosen if the scope really requires it.
How do you prevent a trajectory without results?
By defining the problem, owner, success metric and stop criteria in advance, and doing readback and verification after each step.
How we assess your situation
We map your current process, systems, exceptions and costs. Only then do we advise whether an off-the-shelf solution, a custom integration or another approach makes sense.
From comparison to business value
Continue with the implementation, governance or commercial step that fits this topic.