✓ AI-driven. Human-focused. ✓ Secure knowledge without a new system ✓ AFAS · Exact · Microsoft 365 integration ✓ Sources visible with every important answer ✓ From signal to owner and action ✓ Get it done without muddling through.
✓ Fixed price, no hourly billing ✓ Up and running in two weeks ✓ For Dutch SMBs
SolutionsPlatformPricesKnowledgeAbout usMoreLog inSign up

SME digitalization benchmark: how is the Netherlands doing?

The Netherlands ranks among Europe's top three for digitalization. At the same time, only one in five AI projects here delivers a measurable result — the lowest rate of all the countries studied. Those two figures rarely appear in the same article. They do on this page, because together they tell the real story.

The short version: the Netherlands leads the way in getting started and comes last in finishing.

Layer 1 — Getting started: this is what we’re good at

The figures everyone brandishes—and they’re correct, too.

WhatThe NetherlandsFor comparisonSource
SMEs that meet the basic level of digital intensity89%EU average 71%CBS & Eurostat, 2026
Growth since 2023from 83% to 89%EU target for 2030: 90%CBS, 2026
Residents with basic digital skills84%highest in the EUCBS & Eurostat, 2026
Companies using AI67% to 71%European average: around 64%Frends/Sapio and Sharp, 2026

The basic level means using at least four of the twelve technologies measured by the EU. That's a low bar, and almost all of us meet it.

Layer 2 — Moving forward: this is where progress stalls

Same sources, different question. Not do you use it, but how deep does it go.

WhatThe NetherlandsFor comparisonSource
SMEs with a high level of digitalization24%Denmark 38%DESI / Eurostat, 2025–2026
SMEs that apply data analysis18%—DESI / Eurostat
Employees who say they lack sufficient digital skills52%—DESI / Eurostat
Companies with fewer than 50 employees that use AI structural use28%medium-sized 42%AI Platform MKB, June 2026

The difference between layer 1 and layer 2 is the whole problem: 89% use something; 24% use it well. Between those two figures are sixty-five percent of Dutch small and medium-sized businesses, and little is written about them because it's not a flattering figure.

Layer 3 — Results: this is where we’re lagging behind

The studies that don’t ask what you have, but what it delivers.

WhatFigureSource
AI projects in the Netherlands with a measurable result21% — lowest among the countries surveyedFrends / Sapio Research, April 2026
SMEs stuck in the experimental phasealmost 70%IDC commissioned by SAS, 2026
Standalone AI tools used side by side by whoever gets startedaverage 7 to 12AI Platform MKB, 2026
Cost of manual work, organization with 1,000 employeesapproximately € 7,9 million per yearFrends / Sapio Research, 2026

This is the figure that matters: 21%. The Netherlands gets started faster than the rest of Europe and finishes less. We buy well and safeguard poorly.

Layer 4 — The reason: it’s not the technology

Ask why things are getting stuck, and you’ll hear the same answer everywhere—and it’s never about technology.

Time, not money

42% of SMEs cite a shortage of time and people as their biggest obstacle, 36% cite budget, and 27% technical knowledge. The order says more than the percentages: money is rarely the real problem.AI Platform MKB, 2026

Policy without practice

97% of companies have an AI policy, but about half of employees use AI tools without reporting it. That's called shadow AI, and it means you don't know where your data is going.Sharp, 2026

Adoption gets the least attention

Months spent selecting tools, with hardly any time spent on the people who have to work with them. The result is an expensive license used by a handful of people.multiple real-world sources, 2026

What it costs: the figures that are actually available

There’s a lot of talk about how much time is lost to searching, retyping, and asking around. More has been measured than you might think — it’s just rarely brought together.

What was measuredOutcomeResearch
Time spent by Dutch knowledge workers searching for information520 hours per year
over € 12.000 per person
Lucid Software, 2,148 knowledge workers
Requires processes to be regularly redesigned or documents to be rewritten27%Lucid Software
Time spent correcting data per employee37.8 hours per yearSavanta for Snowflake, 1,088 employees
Annual losses to the Dutch business community due to poor data quality and time spent searching€ 20 billionSavanta for Snowflake
Time spent searching per day, measured internationally2 to 2.5 hoursMcKinsey · IDC

520 hours is well over eleven hours a week. That's not background noise; that's a day and a half.

And it’s not just about time. More than a quarter redo work that’s already been done — not because they don’t care, but because they couldn’t find that it had already been done.

The AI paradox

Another figure that is rarely compared with the previous one. Knowledge workers say they save up to eleven hours a week with AI. But only 13% see that reflected in company performance (Glean, 6,000 knowledge workers, 2026).

The explanation lies in the checking work: 42% spend more time checking AI output than the technology saves, and 49% say mediocre output delays projects (Adaptavist, 2,500 knowledge workers).

It's the same contrast as above, one layer deeper: time is saved at the individual level and lost at the company level. Put AI on shaky data, and you speed up searching while slowing down trust.

Why this matters more in the Netherlands than elsewhere

There’s a figure that’s rarely mentioned in this conversation, and it changes everything: 42% of employed people in the Netherlands work part-time. That's the highest in Europe. Germany is at 28%, Belgium at 24%, and the EU average at 18%.

WhatThe NetherlandsFor comparisonSource
Share of workers working part-time42%Germany 28% · Belgium 24% · EU 18%Eurostat
Average working week32.1 hoursAlmost half work fewer than 35 hoursCBS
Employees working full time53,5%Full-time is the exception rather than the rule hereCBS, 2022
Regularly works from home38%Also top EuropeanEurofound, 2024

In a country where half your colleagues are routinely absent, “just ask Sandra” is not a system.

Elsewhere, knowledge held in people’s heads still works to some extent because everyone is there five days a week. Not here. The question comes up on Wednesday, and the person who knows the answer is here Tuesday and Thursday. So you call someone on their day off, or wait a day and figure it out yourself.

Both take time, and neither is tracked anywhere.

The Netherlands needs a working business memory more than the countries around us — and demonstrably has it less well organized. What exactly a business memory is, has its own page.

What this means if you’re making the decision yourself

If 89% meet the basic level and 21% of AI projects deliver something, then the question isn't should we be doing something with AI too. That question has already been answered: your colleagues are already doing it, and it usually doesn’t help.

The question is: how do you get into that 21%? The figures consistently point in the same direction:

  • Start with a task, not a tool. Seven to twelve separate subscriptions deliver less than one complete workflow.
  • Calculate the return in advance. Not because the amount is right, but because then you can establish afterwards whether it worked. Without measurement, there's no result to measure.
  • Make sure your data is in order before using AI. 18% of SMEs do something with data analysis. That’s the real ceiling.
  • Expect resistance, not a need for training. Adoption is a matter of trust. People need to know what it does, why it helps them and how they can stay in control.
  • Doing nothing is a valid decision. For most tasks, it’s actually the right one.

The fifth layer: what’s missing above

All figures on this page come from surveys. They ask people how far along they are, and then you get an answer to a different question: how far they think that they are. People who know their processes well rate themselves lower than those who have never given them any thought.

That's why we build a fifth layer: figures from scans where companies enter what actually happens. How many hours does the task take? Does it recur often? Is the information stored somewhere? These are questions with answers, not an estimate of your own maturity.

Take part. At the bottom of the AI scan you can participate anonymously: industry, size category and your result. Nothing else — no company name, tasks, amounts or contact details. Once there are enough responses, the figures will appear here, with sources and ranges, for everyone to use.

We publish nothing with fewer than fifty scans. Then every figure is pure chance, and that’s no use to anyone.

Sources

  • CBS & Eurostat — ICT use by businesses, Digital Intensity Index, March 2026
  • CBS — Digitalisation and the knowledge economy 2025, published February 2026
  • European Commission — DESI report, 2025–2026 edition
  • Frends / Sapio Research — State of Integration & AI 2026, 611 decision-makers from six countries, April 2026
  • IDC commissioned by SAS — more than 1,600 SMEs in 28 countries, 2026
  • AI Platform MKB — state of Dutch SMEs, June 2026
  • Sharp — AI adoption research among SMEs, 2026

Figures from these sources are presented in our own words. Where figures differ — AI adoption ranges from 42% to 71%, depending on what is counted — the range is shown instead of the most favorable figure. Last updated: 16 August 2026.

Lucid Software — Acceleration Equation Survey, 2,148 knowledge workers internationally, adjusted to reflect the Netherlands. 520 hours lost per knowledge worker per year.

Savanta for Snowflake — 1,088 employees in the Benelux. Losses due to poor data quality and searching for information: € 20,03 billion a year for Dutch businesses.

Glean — Work AI Index 2026, approximately 6,000 knowledge workers. Time saved through AI compared with measured business results.

Adaptavist — 2,500 knowledge workers internationally, on the time spent checking AI output.

Eurostat and CBS — part-time work, average working week, and working from home.

What is your next step?

Also good to know: frequently asked questions · security and data · terms and conditions · partners · research and figures · templates · what's changing · where you start

Ready for the next step?

Move from explanation to a concrete next step for your organization.

View the next step