Insufficiently substantiated
Value and savings aren’t concrete or measurable. “Working more efficiently” isn’t an amount.
Most AI plans don’t fail because of technology, but because of the question, “What will it deliver?” We build a business case that answers that question: with benefits you can weigh, complete costs, risks that are clearly identified, and three scenarios to choose from.
Five reasons a plan doesn't get implemented, even when it's sound.
Value and savings aren’t concrete or measurable. “Working more efficiently” isn’t an amount.
Benefits such as quality, customer impact and reduced risk are left out, even though they are often greater.
Optimistic estimates without data or references. No one checks them, and afterward none of them add up.
Legal, ethical and operational risks are missing — and they determine whether the plan succeeds.
No owner and no prioritization after the business case. It gets stuck until someone forgets about it.
Six components. If one is missing, the conversation will be about that instead of the decision.
What do we want to achieve, and why now? Without a clearly defined problem, any solution can be justified.
Which processes, users and data are in scope — and what is explicitly out of scope.
In figures where possible, reasoned estimates where necessary. Both are substantiated.
One-time costs, recurring costs, and the hours your own people put in. That last item is missing from almost every quote.
What could go wrong, how serious would it be, what can we do about it and who manages it.
Build, buy, or work with a partner—and why that’s the best option for your situation.
Six steps, from intake to a decision that can be made.
Five types of benefits. The first two are easiest to count; the last three are often greater.
Recurring tasks no one needs to do anymore. Retyping, looking things up, checking.
More work per employee, without adding staff. Especially during growth, that's the argument that matters.
Fewer mistakes and less rework. If you don't get it wrong, you don't have to put it right.
Lower compliance and operational risks. Hard to quantify, costly if things go wrong.
Shorter lead times and faster decision-making. Your customers notice, not just your team.
Not one outcome with a margin of error, but three plans you can compare side by side.
| Scenario | Investment | Value (3 years) | Payback period | Risk | Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative start small, see results fast |
€ 18.000 | € 92.000 | 14.8 mos | low | good starting point |
| Most likely balanced, scalable |
€ 42.000 | € 186.000 | 9.2 mo | average | best choice |
| Ambitious full rollout |
€ 78.000 | € 265.000 | 7.1 mo | high | only with capacity |
Make better decisions with well-founded investments instead of gut instinct.
Insight into returns, costs, and payback period—with the assumptions included.
A realistic assessment of what it means for processes and capacity.
Substantiation for growth, value, and risk management. Also see investors & M&A.
De Frisse Blik provides the figures behind the business case: where time is being lost, in hours and euros, for each area.
Ask your question about AI, the AI Act, integrations or digitalization. The answer comes from the pages of this site, with references to where it can be found.
Type over this order number. Once is doable. Forty times a day, every day, is a job.
Also good to know: frequently asked questions · security and data · terms and conditions · partners · research and figures · templates · what's changing · where you start
An AI idea sounds promising, but which hours, errors or risks will actually change? Make costs, assumptions and measures clear before investing.
Start with a concrete business problem and a measurable outcome, not with an AI tool. Arrange data, ownership, risk and human control before you scale up.
We connect analysis, business intelligence, data and execution so you don't get stuck in advice or loose tooling.
A concrete analysis, priorities, decision criteria, an executable next step and visibility into what needs to be built, integrated or secured next.
Right for Dutch SMB organizations that want to solve a concrete process, knowledge, data or AI problem. Not for organizations looking only for a generic tool demo or unproven AI promise.
Price and scope depend on the chosen next step. View the current fixed packages and pricing logic at pricing for digitization.
We work step by step, make assumptions and ownership explicit, use only the minimum necessary data, and maintain human control over decisions and execution.
No. The preference is one clearly defined problem with a measurable outcome, then scale up.
The current pricing and package logic is on the pricing page; custom work is only chosen if the scope really requires it.
By defining the problem, owner, success metric and stop criteria in advance, and doing readback and verification after each step.
We map your current process, systems, exceptions and costs. Only then do we advise whether an off-the-shelf solution, a custom integration or another approach makes sense.
This page supports the following concrete solution.
Choose the next step that fits what you are viewing now.
Bedrijfsgeheugen gebruikt noodzakelijke cookies voor een goede werking van de site. Met jouw toestemming gebruiken we ook analytische cookies (Google Analytics) om te meten hoe de site wordt gebruikt en die te verbeteren. Je keuze wordt onthouden en je kunt 'm altijd wijzigen. Meer weten? Zie onze privacyverklaring.Met jouw toestemming meten we met Google Analytics hoe de site wordt gebruikt. Zonder toestemming meten we niets. Privacy